Firefly and PC GAMESS-related discussion club



Learn how to ask questions correctly


Re^2: Firefly 7.1G with CUDA 2.3

Veinardi Suendo
vsuendo@chem.itb.ac.id


Dear Alex,

Thank you very much for your help. I think it is due to some wrong instruction in input file. The problem is I do not have any reference for CUDA instruction in this new version of Firefly. So I took your input file and do some modifications, but I am not sure that my modification is correct. The program gave such message: "The image file is valid, but is for a machine type other than the current machine. Select OK to continue, or CANCEL to fail the DLL load." Here I include the input, output and punch files as well. I do hope that you can give me a solution.

Thank you in advance,

Veinardi

On Mon Feb 15 '10 2:58pm, Alex Granovsky wrote
----------------------------------------------
>Hi,

>the code works with CUDA SDK 2.3. Could you please share the
>exact input and output files?

>Regards,
>Alex Granovsky

>On Mon Feb 15 '10 7:16am, Veinardi Suendo wrote
>-----------------------------------------------
>>Dear Colleagues,

>>I have just tried to run a calculation based on the benchmark test of CUDA (http://classic.chem.msu.su/gran/gamess/cuding.htmlhttp://classic.chem.msu.su/gran/gamess/cuding.html), but it failed on our machine. The code said that the dll files were not compatible. I do not know whether it is due to the different CUDA version (we use v2.3) or due to some specific option for each type of NVIDIA Card as written in the input file. Here, we used the cheapest one among GTX200 series: GTX260 made by Manli. We had tested this card to work with trial version of Jacket run on Matlab and everything goes well.

>>Please, if any of you have any suggestions, we need this option to accelerate the geometry optimization and vibration analysis.

>>Thank you in advance,

>>Yours Sincerely,

>>Veinardi Suendo

This message contains the 3 kb attachment
[ cudatest.zip ] Failed cuda test files


[ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Index ]           Tue Feb 16 '10 4:31am
[ Reply ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ]           This message read 1071 times