Thomas Pijper
thomaspijper@hotmail.com
I got your geometry optimization to converge. Input and output are attached. Disabling DLCs seemed to do the trick, though had to increase accuracy a bit further than is normally needed for MP2 gradients with partial linear dependence in the basis. It may be that use of DLCs with IFDMOD=0 (or the finetuning of other DLC-related options) may lead to converge as well. Unfortunately, I currently lack the computational resources to look into this in detail.
Kind regards,
Thom
On Wed Feb 25 '15 7:46pm, Alexander Vasyanin wrote
--------------------------------------------------
>Dear Thomas!
>I've tried to disable DLC (see attached output), but also without success:
>Here are 20 first iterations:
>grep RMS Karma56OH-mp2-d5-opt.dat |cat -n |head -20
> 1 E= -727.7564447892 GMAX= 0.0017745 GRMS= 0.0003867
> 2 E= -727.7564469648 GMAX= 0.0033305 GRMS= 0.0007018
> 3 E= -727.7564682074 GMAX= 0.0009339 GRMS= 0.0002587
> 4 E= -727.7564710925 GMAX= 0.0013823 GRMS= 0.0003371
> 5 E= -727.7564797897 GMAX= 0.0006508 GRMS= 0.0001646
> 6 E= -727.7564826106 GMAX= 0.0009965 GRMS= 0.0002087
> 7 E= -727.7564867291 GMAX= 0.0003811 GRMS= 0.0001103
> 8 E= -727.7564878238 GMAX= 0.0007359 GRMS= 0.0001514
> 9 E= -727.7564885245 GMAX= 0.0002804 GRMS= 0.0000891
> 10 E= -727.7564891625 GMAX= 0.0004215 GRMS= 0.0000810
> 11 E= -727.7564896416 GMAX= 0.0004183 GRMS= 0.0000890
> 12 E= -727.7564900567 GMAX= 0.0003822 GRMS= 0.0000824
> 13 E= -727.7564906809 GMAX= 0.0003616 GRMS= 0.0000840
> 14 E= -727.7564913691 GMAX= 0.0003790 GRMS= 0.0000919
> 15 E= -727.7564919013 GMAX= 0.0005374 GRMS= 0.0000995
> 16 E= -727.7564921004 GMAX= 0.0001675 GRMS= 0.0000519
> 17 E= -727.7564922661 GMAX= 0.0004710 GRMS= 0.0000773
> 18 E= -727.7564909438 GMAX= 0.0006154 GRMS= 0.0001530
> 19 E= -727.7564924073 GMAX= 0.0005384 GRMS= 0.0000735
> 20 E= -727.7564924563 GMAX= 0.0004197 GRMS= 0.0000707
>and 20 last:
>grep RMS Karma56OH-mp2-d5-opt.dat |cat -n |tail -20
> 167 E= -727.7564939108 GMAX= 0.0004250 GRMS= 0.0000655
> 168 E= -727.7564939269 GMAX= 0.0002935 GRMS= 0.0000612
> 169 E= -727.7564937578 GMAX= 0.0003022 GRMS= 0.0000709
> 170 E= -727.7564939269 GMAX= 0.0004125 GRMS= 0.0000621
> 171 E= -727.7564939187 GMAX= 0.0005626 GRMS= 0.0000976
> 172 E= -727.7564939448 GMAX= 0.0002341 GRMS= 0.0000442
> 173 E= -727.7564939459 GMAX= 0.0003595 GRMS= 0.0000584
> 174 E= -727.7564938032 GMAX= 0.0005515 GRMS= 0.0000849
> 175 E= -727.7564939271 GMAX= 0.0003477 GRMS= 0.0000597
> 176 E= -727.7564939483 GMAX= 0.0001578 GRMS= 0.0000333
> 177 E= -727.7564939576 GMAX= 0.0004467 GRMS= 0.0000706
> 178 E= -727.7564938031 GMAX= 0.0006593 GRMS= 0.0000969
> 179 E= -727.7564938967 GMAX= 0.0004309 GRMS= 0.0000837
> 180 E= -727.7564934756 GMAX= 0.0004685 GRMS= 0.0000923
> 181 E= -727.7564939480 GMAX= 0.0003942 GRMS= 0.0000727
> 182 E= -727.7564939279 GMAX= 0.0002317 GRMS= 0.0000473
> 183 E= -727.7564938419 GMAX= 0.0003029 GRMS= 0.0000609
> 184 E= -727.7564937971 GMAX= 0.0003647 GRMS= 0.0000763
> 185 E= -727.7564939054 GMAX= 0.0003855 GRMS= 0.0000595
> 186 E= -727.7564938933 GMAX= 0.0003679 GRMS= 0.0000795
>
>All used options can be found at the head of file.
>Thanks,
>Alexander
>
>
>On Wed Feb 25 '15 7:22pm, Thomas Pijper wrote
>---------------------------------------------
>>Dear Alex and Alexander,
>>I've already started a few tests. One them has DLCs disabled and seems to converge (it's still running) without using outrageously tight convergence criteria. I currently speculate that something is going wrong with the generation of the DLCs, either because of the use of IFDMOD=2 (which is of course experimental) and/or the presence of two intramolecular hydrogen bonds.
>>
>>
>>Kind regards,
>>Thom
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed Feb 25 '15 6:52pm, Alex Granovsky wrote
>>----------------------------------------------
>>>Dear Alexander,
>>>Dear Thom,
>>>I'm sorry for delay with my feedback. I was waiting for CPU resources to play with this job.
>>>I'm now investigate convergence problem and will report my findings in a couple of days.
>>>Kind regards,
>>>Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Wed Feb 25 '15 11:15am, Thomas Pijper wrote
>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>>Dear Alexander,
>>>>Thanks for the followup. Sorry to hear that further tightening of accuracy options did not help. I'm actually surprised this system gives any problems as it is seemingly quite straightforward (a stable neutral organic molecule with a geometry close to equilibrium).
>>>>If you like, I can experiment a bit with your system though this will take some time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Kind regards,
>>>>Thom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Tue Feb 24 '15 9:22pm, Alexander Vasyanin wrote
>>>>--------------------------------------------------
>>>>>Hi All!
>>>>>I didn't solve the problem. Looks like it appears when diffusion functions added to the basis sets: with 6-311G* and cc-pVDZ it optimizes, but 6-311+G* and aug-cc-pVDZ both failed, oscillating with GMAX not less than 1E-4.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I think the problem is with some gradient artifacts so I also tried to set tighter values to NCONV (8) in addition to values for $MP2GRD recommended by Prof. Granovsky, but it breaks SCF convergence.
>>>>>So I gave up...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Mon Feb 9 '15 7:47pm, Alexander Vasyanin wrote
>>>>>-------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>Dear All,
>>>>>>I've got a problem with geometry optimization (see attached input file). DFT methods (B3LYP, PBE0) with the same input geometry converge fine, but MP2 fails to converge showing a progress like this:
>>>>>>$ grep 'E=' 1.dat | cat -n
>>>>>> 1 E= -727.7926962177 GMAX= 0.0001417 GRMS= 0.0000243
>>>>>>I've tried to use symmetry (CS) to make calculation faster with IHREP=5 option, but it also didn't help to reach convergence even after 40 iterations.
>>>>>>Is it possible to improve convergence (may be with some option in $MP2GRD)?
>>>>>>Thanks in advance!
![]() | This message contains the 1404 kb attachment [ MP2 calculation.rar ] Input and output files |