Miro Moman
edelmiro.moman@gmail.com
OpenMpi appears to be be more convenient:
http://www.beowulf.org/archive/2008-April/021197.html
On Tue Jun 22 '10 11:09am, Miro Moman wrote
-------------------------------------------
>For the Debian/Ubuntu users, the Debian way of doing this is:
>$sudo update-alternatives NAME
>where NAME in this case would be mpi and mpirun, respectively. Choosing mpirun.mpich2 applies to both mpirun and mpiexec.
>Then you are presented the alternatives and you can choose the one that better suits your needs.
>Apparently, the default is openmpi.
>Alternatively, you can stick to the defaults and use the openmpi version of Firefly. Anyone knows if there are significant performance differences between openmpi and mpich2?
>
>
>
>On Mon Jun 21 '10 6:13pm, Jim Kress wrote
>-----------------------------------------
>>You know, if you use MPI-SELECTOR, it automatically makes sure you are set-up to properly use the specific MPI tool you select. You don't have to put yourself through all this nightmarish BS to get things to work.
>>It is unreal to me that so many people refuse to use such a simple tool that can resolve so many headaches ...
>