Number of cores used |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Test 1, CPU time and relative speedup |
2936.2 100% |
1488.0 197% |
1033.9 284% |
804.9 365% |
Test 2, Wall clock time and relative speedup |
164.9 100% |
111.2 148% |
93.5 176% |
85.5 193% |
Test 3, CPU time and relative speedup |
5571.9 100% |
2713.7 205% |
1834.9 304% |
1383.4 403% |
Test 4, Wall clock time and relative speedup |
713.0 100% |
378.4 188% |
292.2 244% |
222.1 321% |
Test 5, CPU time and relative speedup |
5929.2 100% |
3105.2 191% |
2258.7 263% |
1867.9 317% |
Test 6, CPU time and relative speedup |
16817.6 100% |
8461.1 199% |
5751.8 292% |
4399.9 382% |
Standard MP4(SDTQ) benchmark, Wall clock time and relative speedup |
5628.7 100% |
2899.0 194% |
2065.4 273% |
1607.0 350% |
Intel Quad-core Core 2 Quadro QX-6700 (Kentsfield) 2.67 GHz, 1067 MHz FSB, Asus P5B (Vanilla) board, 4x 1GB DDR-2 800 5-5-5 DIMMs, 2x Seagate Barracuda-10 320 GB SATA HDDs configured as software RAID-0, Opensuse 10.2 64-bit.
Test 1, single-point direct DFT (B3LYP) energy plus gradient for medium-size system (623 basis functions). View image
Test 2, single-point semiempirical (PM3) energy plus gradient for large system (540 atoms, 2160 basis functions). View image
Test 3, single-point direct MP2 energy for medium-size system (623 basis functions, the same system as one used for Test 1). View image
Test 4, single-point two-state MCQDPT2 energy with ISA energy denominators shift for small model system. View image
Test 5, single-point direct CASSCF(12,12) for medium-size system (retinal molecule, cc-pVDZ, 565 Cartesian basis functions) using ALDET code. View image
Test 6, single-point direct CIS energy plus gradient of first excited state of medium-size system (porphyrin molecule, cc-pVTZ (aug-cc on Nitrogens), 1130 Cartesian basis functions, D2h group). View image
Tests 2, 4, as well as standard MP4 benchmark were run in multithreaded mode, other tests were run in standard parallel mode using dynamic load balancing over p2p interface. Call64 switch was turned on for all tests for faster processing. Note that test 2 does not scale well mainly due to limitations of the PC GAMESS' semiempirical code, while test 4 would scale much better for larger job. CPU or Wall clock times are given on master node in seconds.
Press to visit PC GAMESS' Woodcrest vs. Opteron performance comparison page
Press to visit PC GAMESS Pentium 4 family benchmarks page to compare the results of these benchmarks with those obtained on various Netburst (Pentium 4 and Pentium D) processors.
Press to return back to the PC GAMESS vs. WinGamess performance comparison page to compare the results of these benchmarks with those obtained on other processors