|
Intel Conroe 2.66 GHz |
CPU time, seconds. Test 1, PC GAMESS |
3072.5 |
CPU time, seconds. Test 1, WinGAMESS |
n/a |
CPU time, seconds. Test 2, PC GAMESS |
190.1 |
CPU time, seconds. Test 2, WinGAMESS |
n/a |
CPU time, seconds. Test 3, PC GAMESS |
5399.0 |
CPU time, seconds. Test 3, WinGAMESS |
n/a |
CPU time, seconds. Test 4, PC GAMESS |
716.5 |
CPU time, seconds. Test 4, WinGAMESS |
n/a |
CPU time, seconds. Test 5, PC GAMESS |
5971.4 |
CPU time, seconds. Test 5, WinGAMESS |
n/a |
CPU time, seconds. Test 6, PC GAMESS |
16908.8 |
CPU time, seconds. Test 6, WinGAMESS |
n/a |
Intel Conroe 2.66 GHz, 4 MB L2 cache, 1066 MHz FSB, 2x1024 MB DDR2 667 MHz RAM, 30 GB Serial ATA, Windows 2003 Server x64 Enterprize Edition SP2 beta 1 with PerfEnablePackageIdle set to 1.
Note that all tests were running using only single CPU core in these benchmarks. The PC GAMESS v. 7.0 builds ## 3941 & 3949 (gracefully provided by Dr. Alex Granovsky) was used for testing purposes.
|
Intel Conroe 2.66 GHz |
CPU time on master, seconds. Test 1, PC GAMESS |
1664.2 (output) |
Wall clock time, seconds. Test 2, PC GAMESS |
140.2 (output) |
CPU time on master, seconds. Test 3, PC GAMESS |
2662.0 (output) |
Wall clock time, seconds. Test 4, PC GAMESS |
374.0 (output) |
CPU time on master, seconds. Test 5, PC GAMESS |
3301.5 (output) |
CPU time on master, seconds. Test 6, PC GAMESS |
8764.3 (output) |
Intel Conroe 2.66 GHz, 4 MB L2 cache, 1066 MHz FSB, 2x1024 MB DDR2 667 MHz RAM, 30 GB Serial ATA, Windows 2003 Server x64 Enterprise Edition SP2 beta 1 with PerfEnablePackageIdle set to 1.
Tests 2 and 4 were run in multithreaded mode, other tests were run in standard parallel mode using dynamic load balancing over p2p interface. The PC GAMESS v. 7.0 builds ## 3941 & 3949 (gracefully provided by Dr. Alex Granovsky) was used for testing purposes. Note that test 2 does not scale well mainly due to limitations of the PC GAMESS' semiempirical code, while test 3 would require second HDD to get better CPU to Wall clock time ratio.
Test 1, single-point direct DFT (B3LYP) energy plus gradient for medium-size system (623 basis functions). View image
Test 2, single-point semiempirical (PM3) energy plus gradient for large system (540 atoms, 2160 basis functions). View image
Test 3, single-point direct MP2 energy for medium-size system (623 basis functions, the same system as one used for Test 1). View image
Test 4, single-point two-state MCQDPT2 energy with ISA energy denominators shift for small model system. View image
Test 5, single-point direct CASSCF(12,12) for medium-size system (retinal molecule, cc-pVDZ, 565 Cartesian basis functions) using ALDET code. View image
Test 6, single-point direct CIS energy plus gradient of first excited state of medium-size system (porphyrin molecule, cc-pVTZ (aug-cc on Nitrogens), 1130 Cartesian basis functions, D2h group). View image
Press to return back to the PC GAMESS vs. WinGamess performance comparison page to compare the results of these benchmarks with those obtained on other processors
Press to visit PC GAMESS Pentium 4 family benchmarks page to compare the results of these benchmarks with those obtained on various Netburst (Pentium 4 and Pentium D) processors.