Firefly and PC GAMESS-related discussion club


 
Learn how to ask questions correctly  
 
 
We are NATO-free zone
 


Re: Which is the better algorithm for calculate partial charges?

James Mao
xjamesmao@gmail.com

On Tue Feb 11 '14 12:51pm, anna wrote
-------------------------------------
>Dear all,

>I saw on GAMESS manual that three different algorithms are available to calculate the partial charges of the molecules. GEODESIC algorithm is as default. Why is it better than Connoly and CHELPG?

>Kind regards,
>Anna

Hi Anna,
I think GEODESIC is not "better" than Connoly or CHELPG. Basically it was found ESP fitting atomic charges depend a lot on the locations of chosen fitting points. As a results there are several versions of ESP fitting charges, if I remember correctly, MK, CHELP, CHELPG, ..., they are just different from each other for the fitting points' location. ESP fitting charges are also known for their conformational variablity. Thy manual states GEODESIC is less rotation dependent (less conformational variability), in this sense one might claim it is "better". Hope it help.
Best,
James

[ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Index ]           Tue Feb 11 '14 7:06pm
[ Reply ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ]           This message read 955 times