David G.
david.grifith@gmail.com
Excuse me for some typos and misprints !; I revised them carefully. Again, I got the "linear dependence" error for (~ 200 atoms) and "gradient out of range" error for (~10 atoms). For (~ 10 atoms) as I said before I had examined the Job using SBKJC and the structure was optimized without any problem. Also the position of atoms and the bond distances seems ordinary. Attached please find my input and output files.
On Thu Jan 13 '11 11:59am, sanya wrote
--------------------------------------
>In the first example, try to change the geometry manually. I am afraid that such a configuration is really far from equilibrium.
>As for the second example, there are misprints in lines 3293-3300, 3551-3558, 3581-3588, and missing blank in the first position in line 3659 ('$END' instead of ' $END'). Moreover, Carbon-1 (see lines 10-11) seems to be missing. Look carefully.
>In future, to avoid such errors, use the following format for the basis sets:
> CARBON 6.0 > HYDROGEN 1.0 >Don't forget to leave blanks in the first positions of each line, otherwise the corresponding line will be ignored (the exception is $DATA group, but be careful here, too). And always perform check runs before starting any new job.
> N31 6
> D 1
> 1 0.800000000 1.0000000000
> N31 6
> S 1
> 1 0.0360000 1.0000000
> P 1
> 1 1.1000000000 1.000000000 This message contains the 463 kb attachment
[ D.zip ]
Thu Jan 13 '11 6:45pm
This message read 1588 times