David G.
david.grifith@gmail.com
However I disagree with changing the basis sets but I changed them as proposed by you and also I added $CONTRL d5=1 (or d5=.t.) NZVAR= Attached please find the input and output files. Many Thanks for your attention >d5 activates use of spherical basis set, which reduces the number of d functions from 6 to 5 per atom. This option will help you overcome (at least, partially) linear dependence problem. >Nonzero NZVAR activates optimization in DLC rather than cartesian coordinates. Erratic optimization in your first example was probably due to the use of cartesians. >As for your examples, I saw 6-31+G* basis on carbons and 6-31G basis on hydrogens, while your systems require 6-31G* on carbons (they all may be regarded as inner atoms) and 6-31+G* on hydrogens, because all of them are peripheral: >CARBON >HYDROGEN >Note that the new carbon basis set has no diffuse L (sp) shell with the exponent of 0.0438000, while the new hydrogen basis set has two additional shells, diffuse s with the exponent of 0.0360000 and polarization p with the exponent of 1.1000000. >So, try to change both $CONTRL group and basis sets.
--
Sincerely Yours
David G.
JCU
On Thu Jan 13 '11 1:11am, sanya wrote
-------------------------------------
>I'd suggest some additions to your input files: $CONTRL d5=1 (or d5=.t.) NZVAR=
>S 6
> 1 3047.5249000 0.0018347
> 2 457.3695100 0.0140373
> 3 103.9486900 0.0688426
> 4 29.2101550 0.2321844
> 5 9.2866630 0.4679413
> 6 3.1639270 0.3623120
>L 3
> 1 7.8682724 -0.1193324 0.0689991
> 2 1.8812885 -0.1608542 0.3164240
> 3 0.5442493 1.1434564 0.7443083
>L 1
> 1 0.1687144 1.0000000 1.0000000
>D 1
> 1 0.8000000 1.0000000
>S 3
> 1 18.7311370 0.03349460
> 2 2.8253937 0.23472695
> 3 0.6401217 0.81375733
>S 1
> 1 0.1612778 1.0000000
>S 1
> 1 0.0360000 1.0000000
>P 1
> 1 1.1000000 1.0000000 This message contains the 49 kb attachment
[ C.zip ]
Thu Jan 13 '11 3:41am
This message read 958 times