Firefly and PC GAMESS-related discussion club



Learn how to ask questions correctly


Re^3: Error in calculation on two processors

Alex Granovsky
gran@classic.chem.msu.su


Hi,

This is very rough Linux equivalent of the following Win32 error:

//  The process cannot access the file because
//  it is being used by another process.
//
#define ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION          32L

Check write permissions of /home, /home/14082010.1407,
and /home/14082010.1407/storefiles. Most likely,
you do not have permissions to create /home/14082010.1407 etc...
If you do have, check for zombie or dead Firefly processes on node
that reports this error. The file can still be locked by one of them.

Regards,
Alex Granovsky

On Sun Nov 7 '10 9:06pm, Eldar Mamin wrote
------------------------------------------
>Thanks, it helped

>But error

> "FSF: fatal error no. 0x00000020 in sub SEQOPN on unit  10"

>arose. And as i see it goes on 1 processor.

>out file is attached.
>
>
>
>On Sat Nov 6 '10 10:22am, Alex Granovsky wrote
>----------------------------------------------
>>Hi,

>>cleanipcs is your friend :)

>>regards,
>>Alex Granovsky

>>On Thu Nov 4 '10 7:50pm, Eldar Mamin wrote
>>------------------------------------------
>>>Dear FireFly users,

>>>I perform calculations on cluster.
>>>processor:  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU  X5355  @ 2.66GHz

>>>my ff version is  7.1.G download links, Linux MPICH-MX, dynamically linked NPTL-based version

>>>MPICH is   mpich-mx-gcc-1.2.7

>>>I reserve resoures by command qsub -I -l walltime=00:30:00,nodes=1:ppn=2

>>>And then

>>> mpirun -np 2 -machinefile $PBS_NODEFILE /home/14082010.1407/firefly -i  /home/14082010.1407/De_1411sad_Zmat.inp -o /home/14082010.1407/De_1411sad_Zmat.OUT -t /home/14082010.1407/storefiles -ex /home/14082010.1407/ex/ -r -p -stdext
>>>p0_10215:  p4_error: semget failed for setnum: 0
>>>p0_10214:  p4_error: semget failed for setnum: 0

>>>what does it mean?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>


[ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Index ]           Sun Nov 7 '10 11:50pm
[ Reply ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ]           This message read 835 times