Firefly and PC GAMESS-related discussion club



Learn how to ask questions correctly


Re: H_eff in XMCQDPT

Alex Granovsky
gran@classic.chem.msu.su


Dear Sanya,

I'm afraid XMCQDPT2 with dimension of model space equal
to ca. 30-50 as you suggest will be prone to intruder
state problem. I'd not use more than ca. 20 states for
organic pi-systems. Unfortunately there are no general
recipe here. You can try to perform several calculations
with increasing dimension of Heff and check
how stable the transition energies of interest are. Another
thing to check is the overlap matrix of non-orthogonal
eigenvectors corresponding to Heff before symmetrization.
There should not be large off-diagonal values here, and
all eigenvalues of non-symmetric Heff must be
real numbers.

Cheers,
Alex


On Sun May 29 '11 5:11pm, sanya wrote
-------------------------------------
>How to estimate the size of H_eff in XMCQDPT (nstate or kstate keys)? I know that for 1 excited state H_eff of 10-12 states is enough, but typically I need 3-4 excited states. Does this proportion keeps for higher-lying states?


[ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Index ]           Tue May 31 '11 9:34pm
[ Reply ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ]           This message read 787 times