Firefly and PC GAMESS-related discussion club



Learn how to ask questions correctly


Interpretation SAP coefficients

Alexandr
planfactor@mail.ru


Hi, all.
I now comprehend results of calculations TD-DFT by means of FireFly.
Has found in Forum discussion of a similar problem - a full fog:

http://classic.chem.msu.su/cgi-bin/ceilidh.exe/gran/gamess/forum/?C35d443cd3dzG-7147-1332+00.htm

Me interpretation of position of strips in the calculated spectrum of absorption - position of strips and their intensity interests.

My questions:
1) As are obviously connected SAP coefficients, resulted in the table of results of my calculations with characteristics of spectra which me interest? Whether it is possible if necessary most on SAP coefficients to reproduce these characteristics for check?
EXCITED STATE   2  ENERGY=     -1311.8178999363  S = 0.0  SPACE SYM = A  

         ----------------------------------------------
         EXCITATIONS & DEEXCITATIONS     SAP COEFFICENT
         FROM MO     TO MO
         ----------------------------------------------
           93         97                   0.14557788
           97         93                   0.04523790
           93         98                  -0.10327981
           98         93                  -0.02115534
           94         95                   0.97250937
           95         94                  -0.06443424
           94         96                  -0.10968391
           96         94                   0.01536845
         ----------------------------------------------............................................................................

2) Why the sums of squares of differences SAP coefficients under the similar tables it is stable more units? It and is necessary? It is important for calculation of contributions ÌÎ in percentage.

3) As the data from the table "Unrelaxed dipole is connected..." with the previous table "TDDFT exitation..."?

4) For what the given tables "TDDFT natural orbital..." are practically used, except as for obvious reasonings: for some ÍÎÌÎ occupance become less than 2 (why and so it is clear) etc.? This table can is necessary (is necessary instead of useful) to any further calculations?

Many thanks,
Alexandr


[ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Index ]           Fri Feb 25 '11 0:37am
[ Reply ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ]           This message read 1140 times