sanya
sanya@photonics.ru
On Tue Oct 9 '12 4:47am, Patrick SK Pang wrote
----------------------------------------------
>Dear Sanya,
>I am interested in the optimized geometry and the electronic energy of each excited state; therefore I will perform geometry optimization of each excited state using the MCSCF method. Can I say the use of state averaging in my case is redundant?
>Regards,
>Patrick
>On Mon Oct 8 '12 11:44pm, sanya wrote
>-------------------------------------
>>State-averaging is necessary when you study quasi-degenerate or excited states. In state-specific calculation, the resulting orbitals are best for the selected state, while in the state-averaged calculation the orbitals are sort of compromise, because they are best for several states. However, state-averaging is the only way to obtain a common set of orbitals for several states.
>>On Mon Oct 8 '12 6:33pm, Patrick SK Pang wrote
>>----------------------------------------------
>>>Dear all,
>>>What are the merits and drawbacks of using state averaging in MCSCF calculation? Similarly, What are the merits and drawbacks of MCSCF calculaton without state averaging?
>>>Thanks!
>>>Patrick