Vyacheslav
kreme_vg@chemy.kolasc.net.ru
As to "ill-defined" basis sets: I need rather large all-electron basis set for using with Aimall. Probably ANO-RCC basis set is not very good. However I have no another for such metals as Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf... What could you advise?
Thank you for response!
Vyacheslav
--------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun Oct 31 '10 2:54pm, Alex Granovsky wrote
----------------------------------------------
>Vyacheslav,
>>I understand, that development of the insignificant conveniences do not bring great glory to FF' developers, but I hope, that sometime they will make this boring job, for what I am thankful in advance to them :-).
>This is not the question of glory etc.. it's rather just a question
>of time and how to split it most efficiently between QC core
>development and input/output file enhancements, delivering maximum benefits
>to our users.
>The necessity of changes in the input file format,
>as well as some changes in outputs is evident; however,
>this cannot be done momentarily. In addition, compatibility
>with various pre- and post-processing tools like Facio,
>ChemCraft etc... is important and should not be broken by
>these changes.
>
>
>>I also hope that during this light time they will not overlook to correct format of out files under output of the data with a big basis sets and as a result I can use programs for the visual analysis...
>As I have already explained, this could break compatibility with
>visualization software. Another point is that it is better to avoid
>calculations with ill-defined basis sets resulting in large orbital
>expansion coefficients.
>
>
>Regards,
>Alex
>