Bernhard Dick
bernhard.dick@chemie.uni-regensburg.de
I attach the input and output - perhaps there is a an incompatible combination of keywords that I am not aware of?
Two further questions:
a) can a TRANSITN run also calculate oscillator strength for XMC-QDPT2 states?
b) Is there a 1:1 correspondence between the CASSCF states and the XMC-QDPT2 states? I.e., could a state with a large oscillator strength have a different place in the list in CASSCF and with XMC-QDPT2?
I used the NEVPT2 method in ORCA for comparison. It provides oscillator strengths, but the excitation energies are too high.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
*** XMC-QDPT2 ENERGIES ***
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE 1ST ORDER 2ND ORDER
1 E(MCSCF)= -1099.890894827395 E(MP2)= -1106.119584872618
2 E(MCSCF)= -1099.735990116105 E(MP2)= -1104.083136633190
3 E(MCSCF)= -1099.733877626624 E(MP2)= -1103.954679662041
4 E(MCSCF)= -1099.681143061018 E(MP2)= -1103.936946076146
5 E(MCSCF)= -1099.674487604719 E(MP2)= -1103.931452963207
6 E(MCSCF)= -1099.666980999407 E(MP2)= -1103.895001735584
7 E(MCSCF)= -1099.666499513098 E(MP2)= -1103.879138376253
8 E(MCSCF)= -1099.656218109184 E(MP2)= -1103.872965665376
9 E(MCSCF)= -1099.633450909673 E(MP2)= -1103.861755356159
10 E(MCSCF)= -1099.618913815137 E(MP2)= -1102.811860797204
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
![]() | This message contains the 5815 kb attachment [ Rhod02_CCT_CAS1010av10_MP2.zip ] |