Firefly and PC GAMESS-related discussion club


 
Learn how to ask questions correctly  
 
 
We are NATO-free zone
 



Re^5: memory allocation for CASSCF

Alex Granovsky
gran@classic.chem.msu.su


Dear Alexandra,

Thank you very much.

Could you share some additional details, namely, how much CPU cores
were used to run this job, what was the particular MPI implementation,
and how much physical memory was installed into computer system you
used to run Firefly?

All the best,
Alex




On Thu Jun 15 '17 5:18pm, Alexandra Tsybizova wrote
---------------------------------------------------
>Dear Dr. Granovsky,
>I am very sorry for the delay: I had my hands full with other things so I postponed solving this problem for some time.

>Here is the link to the input file. Hope it works.

>Best regards,
>Alexandra

>On Thu Jun 15 '17 4:24pm, Alex Granovsky wrote
>----------------------------------------------
>>Dear Alexandra,

>>have you already solved this problem? Do you need some help?

>>Kind regards,
>>Alex Granovsky
>>
>>
>>On Wed May 24 '17 2:33pm, Alexandra Tsybizova wrote
>>---------------------------------------------------
>>>Dear Dr. Granovsky,
>>>I have yet another problem with the same job. I have followed your suggestions and reran the calculation, however when it gets to the calculation of CI it seem to freeze. Here are the last lines in the output file that I get:

>>>AMES LABORATORY DETERMINANTAL FULL CI
>>>     PROGRAM WRITTEN BY JOE IVANIC AND KLAUS RUEDENBERG
>>>          PROGRAM REWRITTEN BY ALEX A. GRANOVSKY
>>>     --------------------------------------------------

>>> THE NUMBER OF DETERMINANTS HAVING SPACE SYMMETRY A  
>>> IN POINT GROUP C1   WITH SZ=  0.0 IS         245025
>>> WHICH INCLUDES          70785 CSFS WITH S=  0.0
>>> WHICH INCLUDES         113256 CSFS WITH S=  1.0
>>> WHICH INCLUDES          51480 CSFS WITH S=  2.0
>>> WHICH INCLUDES           9009 CSFS WITH S=  3.0
>>> WHICH INCLUDES            495 CSFS WITH S=  4.0

>>>and then it just sits there and it looks as it does nothing. I get no error message though. After following this calculation for about a month I tried to rerun it and the problem seems to be reproducible. The program quickly gets to this point again and again stops doing anything it seems.

>>>Should I have waited longer?

>>


[ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Index ]           Thu Jun 15 '17 6:16pm
[ Reply ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ]           This message read 467 times